|
David Gibbs wrote: >>>I'm not sure how the constraints were removed though ... and find >>>it odd that a primary key constraint could be removed when a >>>foreign key constraint depends on it. Kind of like deleting a >>>physical file when a logical file is built over it. >>perhaps SAVLIB save accesspaths(*NO)? > Some of the constraints are there ... but not all of them. On a similar note ... does anyone know of a way to test a database to make sure that all the necessary constraints are valid? When I restored the database on our system (and when the customer restored it from a backup on their system) there were a number of errors (previously mentioned) that indicates that some of the constraints were invalid because the dependent (mostly primary key constraints) were missing. It's my suspicion that the ORIGINAL database was fine, but the restored database had it's constraints screwed up when it was restored. I've asked our customer to open a PMR with IBM to pursue this issue ... but in our efforts to repair the database, we would like to try and make sure the database hasn't lost anything else. Thanks! david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.