×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Graap, Ken wrote:
The more I think about this why would it even matter what the block size is
for an iSeries controlled disk?
The "virtual" disk space or REAL disk allocated to a UNIX partition would be
formatted and controlled by the OS running in that parturition (AIX or
Linux).
I guess this all depends on whether or not linux or AIX has direct access
to the hardware or if they are "hosted" by OS/400. If hosted, they get
all the disk info (size, blocksize, striping, etc.) from OS/400 and not
from the disk itself. In which case making the filesystems should
probably use whatever OS/400 presents to it. If they have direct access
to the hardware, then use the blocksizes that the hardware best supports.
If you don't use RAID, then any blocksize is probably ok. But most RAID
controllers read and write in a certain blocksize and setting your
filesystem to use the same blocksize will result in the best performance.
James Rich
It's not the software that's free; it's you.
- billyskank on Groklaw
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.