× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



All good points.

Standard IBM supplied command.  I could do some tricks to stop the one 
option I detest.  Since what I am trying to stop is not really a security 
item I'm leaning towards the "baseball bat to the knees and don't do it 
again" solution.  Crap flying around the last two weeks isn't giving me a 
whole lot of time to really delve into code.

Rob Berendt
-- 
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





Scott Klement <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
03/10/2005 06:21 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: Securing a command from command line.







Hi Rob,

> I want people to not use a certain command from the command line but 
using
> it in a program is ok.  I even want to restrict QSECOFR so LMTCPB is not
> the option.  First thought was CHGCMD and take away *INTERACT.  However,
> that killed the use in a program.  I thought *IPGM was all I needed.
> However *IPGM is pretty insistent that the program be a CLP.  Trying the
> command with QCMDEXC in RPGLE blows up after you remove *INTERACT.

Heh... RPG programs can't run CL commands, that's why *IPGM and *IMOD both 

only work with CL (and ILE CL)

I assume that you're running the command through QCMDEXC, QCAPCMD, or a 
similar interface.  In that case, it's treated just like a command-line. 
It's not really a program-to-program call!

If you somehow made it so that it was allowed through QCMDEXC and not 
allowed from the command-line, what would stop a user from simply typing 
CALL PGM(QCMDEXC) PARM('MYCMD PARM() PARM()' 123) at the command line and 
completely defeating your security?

Likewise, if you wrap the command with a CL program so that it can be 
called from RPG (or whatever) what will stop the user from calling the CL 
program from the command line using the CALL command?

I think your best bet is to write routines that analyze the call stack to 
see where the program is being called from. Then your program can end 
itself if it's called from the command line rather than from a program.

You'll also want to make sure that the source code isn't on the system, 
that you've removed the ability to retrieve that code with RTVCLSRC (etc) 
in order to prevent someone with QSECOFR access from simply changing the 
code and recompiling it.

That's still not a perfect fix, since someone with that level of access 
could use the "Display, Alter, Dump" utility to change the actual machine 
code to bypass your checks -- but it certainly makes it more difficult.

-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.