RE: Dumb adopted authority question

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [SMTP:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Bipes
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 10:35 AM
> To:   'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
> Subject:      RE: Dumb adopted authority question
> 
> David I have run into this.  Make sure Qsecofr has *use authority to
> Qsecofr
> profile.  You must have *use authority to your own profile to use the api.
> 
> Chris Bipes
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Folks:
> 
> If I am signed on as QSECOFR, and run a program (ILE CL) that is owned 
> by a normal user and has USRPRF(*OWNER), what is the programs effective 
> authority?  QSECOFR or the users?
> 
> I've got a program that is being run as QSECOFR, but the USRPRF value is 
> that of a normal user ... the program is failing when it's trying to 
> switch profile handles to another *SECOFR profile because it does not 
> have *USE authority to QSECOFR.
> -- 
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or privileged
information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy the message.