× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



As of Jan 1st 2005, I believe there was an industry change with the
length of the UPC code, allowing 13 or 14 digits.  
http://www.adams1.com/pub/russadam/upccode.html
 
Has anyone conformed to this new standard with printing?  I'm not sure
how to do it.
 
I found a thread talking about this new compliance:
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200407/msg00470.html
 
... but the answer there is to conform to scan the new length, but not
to conform to printing it as such.  We need to reproduce the UPC to put
it on the package when we send it out, so we do need to print a 13- or
14-digit UPC.
 
Looking at:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/iseries/v5r2/ic2924/info/rzakd/rzakdmstptb
arco.htm#HDRPTBARCO
I wonder if Table 1 has something I can use, or does IBM need to supply
a new valid bar code definition?
 
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
 
Kurt Anderson
Application Developer
Highsmith Inc.
W5527 State Road 106, P.O. Box 800
Fort Atkinson, WI 53538-0800
TEL (920) 563-9571  FAX (920) 563-7395
EMAIL kjanderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.