|
Hi Chris,
HTH, Philipp
Chris Bipes schrieb:
I have two routes to a remote location. One is faster than the other. We set up the routing table as such: As400 1 = 10.10.1.1, As400 2 = 10.10.2.1 Destination Subnet Hop Available Metric Dup Rte Pty 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.200 *YES 2 5 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.201 *YES 3 5
The other end: Destination Subnet Hop Available Metric Dup Rte Pty 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.2.200 *YES 2 5 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.2.201 *YES 3 5
The WAN ports on 10.10.1.200 is connected to 10.10.2.200 The WAN ports on 10.10.1.201 is connected to 10.10.2.201
Now why would a trace show as400 1 using 200 and a trace from as400 2 using 201? Also when one route dropped today, AS400 2 did not switch routes. The failure was at AS400 1 side of the network.
Will running RouteD help to resolve these routing issues?
Christopher K. Bipes --
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.