× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. November 2004

Routing

I have two routes to a remote location.  One is faster than the other.  We
set up the routing table as such:  As400 1 = 10.10.1.1, As400 2 = 10.10.2.1
Destination     Subnet          Hop             Available       Metric  Dup
Rte Pty
10.10.1.0       255.255.255.0   10.10.1.200     *YES    2               5
10.10.1.0       255.255.255.0   10.10.1.201     *YES    3               5

The other end:
Destination     Subnet          Hop             Available       Metric  Dup
Rte Pty
10.10.2.0       255.255.255.0   10.10.2.200     *YES    2               5
10.10.2.0       255.255.255.0   10.10.2.201     *YES    3               5

The WAN ports on 10.10.1.200 is connected to 10.10.2.200
The WAN ports on 10.10.1.201 is connected to 10.10.2.201

Now why would a trace show as400 1 using 200 and a trace from as400 2 using
201?  Also when one route dropped today, AS400 2 did not switch routes.
The failure was at AS400 1 side of the network.

Will running RouteD help to resolve these routing issues?

Christopher K. Bipes

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.