|
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 15:58, Scott Klement wrote: > Instead, what I recommend is to create an interface to get the weight > information back to your program that's designed for program-to-program > communications, rather than one that is designed for interfacing with a > human being. I second that. > It's common today for scales to have RS-232 interfaces. With these > interfaces, when a weight is placed on a scale, the weight is sent > straight out that port. That port can be connected to a PC or even to an > iSeries (if the scale is within 50 ft or so of the iSeries) and read > directly by a program. Actually, there are devices that can translate serial to ethernet to serial again, so this distance limitation can be eliminated, especially in the case where your chosen device doesn't have an ethernet port, or the version of that device that does have an ethernet port is too costly. http://www.manufacturingtalk.com/news/dgi/dgi101.html -- Regards, Rich Current Conditions in Des Moines, IA Few Clouds Temp 75.2F Winds out of the Southeast at 9mph
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.