×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.



  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. May 2004

RE: i5/OS V1R1M0

We do. It'd have to become a 2-pronged test - i.e., if IBM would include the OS name somewhere so it can be retrieved. So, is 'OS/400' tucked away somewhere in a message description or something? Have never had to look.

Could become another example of what happens when you assume!

Vern

At 11:06 PM 5/5/2004, you wrote: 
> From: Larry Bolhuis
>
> IBM Wanted to number it V1R1 and it almost happened. However software
> vendors informed Rochester that their software would not be ready for
6
> months or more just to handle this new numbering. Rochester wisely
> changed the plan.

How many software vendors depend on ascending version numbers?  For
what?  I'm just wondering.

Joe



This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.