RE: i5/OS V1R1M0 -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: i5/OS V1R1M0
From: Neil Palmer <NeilP@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 01:30:24 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Bigger numbers justify higher prices !  ;-)

Besides, they are probably wanting to use V6R1 for the first Power6 
release.

...Neil




"Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
2004/05/06 00:06



To
"'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: i5/OS V1R1M0






> From: Larry Bolhuis
> 
> IBM Wanted to number it V1R1 and it almost happened. However software
> vendors informed Rochester that their software would not be ready for
6
> months or more just to handle this new numbering. Rochester wisely
> changed the plan.

How many software vendors depend on ascending version numbers?  For
what?  I'm just wondering.

Joe

Follow-Ups:

RE: i5/OS V1R1M0 , Don

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.