RE: i5/OS V1R1M0

[Don <dr2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

makes sense to me....and that should be 18-26 months away....



On Thu, 6 May 2004, Neil Palmer wrote:

> Bigger numbers justify higher prices !  ;-)
>
> Besides, they are probably wanting to use V6R1 for the first Power6
> release.
>
> ...Neil
>
>
>
>
> "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 2004/05/06 00:06
>
>
>
> To
> "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: i5/OS V1R1M0
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > From: Larry Bolhuis
> >
> > IBM Wanted to number it V1R1 and it almost happened. However software
> > vendors informed Rochester that their software would not be ready for
> 6
> > months or more just to handle this new numbering. Rochester wisely
> > changed the plan.
>
> How many software vendors depend on ascending version numbers?  For
> what?  I'm just wondering.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>