RE: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article. -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

But, even with all of that extra work, the right settings of QFRCCVNRST & 
QALWOBJRST will either render the program back to user state, or refuse to 
restore it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Carpenter [mailto:CarpCon@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:24 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Re: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article.
> 
> WRKDBF includes a patched program UNDELM (read undeleted record).  It's
> system state, patched code (forged pointer) and the correct checksums
> needed
> to allow it to be restored.
> 
> 
> Keith
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark S. Waterbury" <mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxx>
> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article.
> 
> 
> > Right on! I second that!
> >
> > Sadly, I do know that there are still vendors shipping "patched" code...
> :-o
> > (Buyer beware...)
> >

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.