|
> -----Original Message----- > From: michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Subject: RE: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article. > > Phil - > > > As an aside, if you're in SST to do this frequently, it's much less time > > consuming to modify the SLIC module that actually does the checking of > > states/domains and 'turn' the checking off once and for all... > > Is this a good thing to do? I would think that circumventing IBM's > security would be less than desireable. The answer to that is relative to what you're doing, and why. It's certainly something I *wouldn't* recommend you do just to see. I'm hardly going to suggest that as part of your scheduled IPL that you go do this too :o) --phil
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.