Re: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article.

Agreed. I don't think it's a good idea to teach people how to patch
programs to make them work outside of security boundaries.

On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 12:21:09 -0700, "Keith Carpenter" <CarpCon@xxxxxxx>
said:
> This is a patch to make a program run in "system state".
> 
> As presented ("tips" for administrators), this is bad advise.
> 
> It would be more appropriate to recommend that if you get a MCH6801
> (domain/storage violation) error, that you should contact the software
> vendor (or programmer) and get a fix from them.
> 
> Without knowing why a program is generating this error, it would be
> foolish
> to simply patch it and have it potentially damage system objects.
> 
> Search400 should remove the article.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 10:15 AM
> Subject: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article.
> 
> 
> > Is it just me, or does this strike anybody else as being "wrong".  That
> that
> > it can't be done, but that it shouldn't.
> >
> >
> http://search400.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid3_gci958399,00.html?track=NL
> > -177&ad=479700
> >
> > Anybody with more experience in this area care to comment?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Charles
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
-- 
  
  michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web