Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article. -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article.
From: CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:15:10 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Is it just me, or does this strike anybody else as being "wrong".  That that
it can't be done, but that it shouldn't.

http://search400.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid3_gci958399,00.html?track=NL
-177&ad=479700

Anybody with more experience in this area care to comment?

Thanks,
Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article. , Chuck Lewis
Re: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article. , Keith Carpenter
Re: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article. , michaelr_41

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.