|
I have always preferred dumb 5250 twinax devices as consoles because when the chips are down, they work. However, they do take a lot of space, are no longer sold by IBM, are not the "modern" way of doing things, etc, etc, etc. I had a model 150 with an async ops console one time and it was terrible - the thing would fail to reconnect half the time in the middle of touchy procedures like IPLs for PTFs, storage dumps, etc. I am hoping the new console technologies have come a long way since then and maybe it is time to try again. Which of IBM's current console approaches do you guys recommend (or not)? We are hoping to get a new system (maybe 870) that will run several LPARs (about 5, all OS/400). It would be great to be able to use the same device for all the partitions and to be able to connect remotely to perform functions like IPL, maybe even DST, etc. I guess I am asking for control panel functions beyond initiating an IPL such as viewing SRCs, change modes, etc. What about just as a multi-system console, without the control-panel functions? Any difference in opinion without that requirement? What have you had good results with? Any horror stories? THANKS EVERYBODY, -Marty
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.