|
Glenn, The auto tuner is already collecting data and forecasting - on relatively recent events. If it were to forecast on the same time this day last week (and the week before and the week before), it might be improved. However, experience suggests that usage trends tend not to be consistent, so accurate proactive forecasting might be hard to accomplish. I do believe there ~is~ an algorithm possible that would allow the auto tuner to work well, but more than likely, it would take a second iSeries to run the algorithm for the first... Actually, I think the auto tuner should be turned off. If it is on, it should be throttled as much as possible. Given that 99% of performance problems are application related (yes, that means we write crappy application code for the most part), the other 99% of performance problems on most iSeries and AS/400s are caused by poor performance tuning and 99% of ~that~ is caused by the sloppy shipped values and the sloppy auto tuner values. I find that performance tuning is truly an art based on scientific principles. If applied correctly, a performance methodology with human performance tuning and configuration runs circles around the auto tuner monkey. Most companies apply no effort to this end. I believe this means they are not supporting their customers with efficient application of computing resources. With a well-planned performance methodology, the cost of the effort is easily recouped with better system throughput. Mostly, though, performance tuning is a misunderstood science. One simple example - we all tend to think that we can increase timeslices (for our own personal benefit, of course), but this is the exact opposite of what should be done to increase throughput. Timeslices are shipped at the same values configured for a S/38 model one and should be significantly reduced to reflect the speed of current processors. If this simple fact is completely ignored due to misinformation, then there is not much chance that any iSeries out there will ever be utilized correctly... :-) Hmmmm. maybe a good auto tuner IS needed... Stepping off the soapbox now, Trevor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Ericson" Subject: Re: Auto Tuning > Trevor, > based on your views, would you think it a good idea for the auto > tuner to save some stats, and forecast forward based on trend to be move > from reactive to proactive status?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.