× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Dave,

We don't use Save-while-active, but one thought that comes to mind in our
environment is killing TCP knocks off all of our remote controllers and thus
report spewing printers. I know that restarting it reconnects everything
(normally) but we have line printers that that would affect. We don't use
anything like Showcase (SMALL company) so killing QINTER and some vendor
subsystems does the job for us.

We are on a new 810 now with the IBM 3581-H23 Tape Unit that SCREAMS so
backups are a blip (now) :-)

Chuck

Chuck Lewis
Manager of I.T.
Lee Supply Corp.
Indianapolis, IN


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David A Parnin
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:50 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Save-while-active questions / concerns

Greetings everyone,

For our daily backups we have traditionally killed QINTER and another
subsystem or two, done the save's, then IPLed.  Awhile back I removed the
IPL and added code to restart what was shut down.  I am now getting ready
to implement save-while-active to reduce the downtime window even more.  I
don't have a problem with monitoring for when the checkpoint has been
established and restarting things but I do have a couple of questions.

How close to a restricted state does the system need to be to establish a
good checkpoint?  In the past even though QINTER was down there was still a
subsystem with some never-ending EDI jobs.  I assume that needs to be ended
to get a good checkpoint.  Perhaps a bigger concern is with ODBC jobs.  We
have a number of users that use Showcase queries.  They don't appear to
lock the files.  Should those be addressed?  I doubt that we've got anybody
using FPT or Telnet but should I end TCP/IP just to be safe?

I'm also concerned about the SAVACTWAIT parameter.  I want to avoid objects
being skipped.  Given that it has a 2 minute wait time per object if they
are in use this could add up if I happen to miss a couple of things.  In
case it matters we are at V5R1.  I was planning on using the *SYNCLIB
option.  I've read through the archives but didn't see these things
addressed.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Dave Parnin
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN  46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.