|
Even well researched anecdotes can be dismissed as platform bias, or exceptions to the rule. The school district would do better to document a full cost-justification (including personnel requirements), and to visit references. Surely the BP can provide reference customers (ideally another school system) using the new solutions on the new platform. If the BP can't provide such references tell the lady to recommend to management that an EXPERIENCED partner be found. If references are provided it's an opportunity to find out first hand if the new systems required additional staffing for systems and/or database administration. School districts can be very sensitive to permanent increases in yearly expenses. -Jim -----Original Message----- From: pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:40 AM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: iSeries to another platform and back To the list: At our local user group meeting last night, I sat next to a lady who is with a school district in suburban Chicago. She is being pressured by people (who think they know systems) into abandoning the 400 platform. Their BP is also hinting at abandoning the platform. Her question is this: Does anyone have any horror stories (that they'd be allowed to share) of organizations that have gone off on another platform, and then come back to the 400. I told her the Microsoft story, and she thought it was hilarious. Any help you can provide would be well received. Paul Nelson
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.