RE: activation group problem -Maybe?

That's what I'm going to have her do.  In fact that was my original
suggestion, but then I thought it might be an activation group issue, so
I went chasing after that.  

-----Original Message-----
From: MWalter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:MWalter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:55 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: activation group problem -Maybe?



It's submitting a new job. Activation groups are scoped within jobs, if
I'm not mistaken. Why not have the submitted CL place the lock on the
file?

Thanks,

Mark

Mark D. Walter
Senior Programmer/Analyst
CCX, Inc.
mwalter@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ccxinc.com


|--------+------------------------------------------------------->
|        |          "Smith, Mike" <Mike_Smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  |
|        |          Sent by:                                     |
|        |          midrange-l-bounces+mwalter=hanoverwire.com@mi|
|        |          drange.com                                   |
|        |                                                       |
|        |                                                       |
|        |          09/26/2003 01:35 PM                          |
|        |          Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical |
|        |          Discussion                                   |
|        |                                                       |
|--------+------------------------------------------------------->
 
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------|
  |
|
  |       To:     <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
  |       cc:
|
  |       Subject:     activation group problem -Maybe?
|
 
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------|




I have a co worker that has a CL that is called interactively.  This CL
does and Excluvsive lock on a file and then submits a 2nd CL.  This
Second Cl will not run, because of the lock.  I have tried putting both
Cl's in the same named activation group.  I have tried putting the 2nd
CL in *Caller and the First in the default activation group.

Is this likely an activation group problem?  Can someone enlighten me.
I've tried looking at the archives, but i haven't found an answer yet.

Thanks

Mike
_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.