|
Are you inciting a "read first, then dowhile with read at the bottom of loop" vs. "setll, dountil, read, if" war? If so, I'm not interested. It's already been fought. <g> GA --- Carel Teijgeler <coteijgeler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For the obvious reasons: it is more readable, maintainable, and not > clutterded with enddo's or endifs. > > But if you want it fully procedural: > > fBONLPF IF E K DISK > fBLPART UF E K DISK > c Read BONLPF > LR > c DoW *INLR = *OFF > c ORDER Setll BLPART > c ORDER Reade BLPART 99 > c DoW *IN99 = *OFF > c Delete BLPART > c ORDER Reade BLPART 99 > c Enddo > c Read BONLPF LR > c Enddo > > Regards, > Carel Teijgeler __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.