|
I agree with what you are saying. You are indeed among the more helpfull on this list as, I , am more on the listening side. And I apreciate this list very much. the reason for my posting (And I regreat already having posted it) was that I have seen newbee posting in the past that received a much warmer response and were not originating from a third world contries. This gave me the impression (hopefully wrong) that some of us decided of the type of answer to give not only based on the question itself but also on the origin of the person asking the question. But I agree completely that anybody looking for information should do some research (books, IBM web site, training ...) before asking this list and some times it is obvious thet the person did not.Then a simple reminder should be the appropriate response. Email is not the right tool for training. Thanks Denis Robitaille Directeur services technique TI 819 363 5187 SUPPORT Jour (EST) Daytime : 819-363-5087 En-dehors des heures (EST) After hour : 819-363-5095 Network Status : 819-363-5096 >>> buck.calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx 08/14/03 10:55am >>> > How about if the question is legitimate (I mean by that not a newbe > question) but comes from someone form one of these contries. > Will you answer them? Bonjour, Denis! Ça va? I have answered many simple questions, newbies included. After years of doing it, I have finally realised that it is impossible to train someone via email. That is, if someone posts a very specific question, it is easy to answer. Probably because the question has so many details, it is easy to see that the poster will understand the answer. When someone posts a generic question like 'How do I read a file?' it is much harder to answer. Does the poster understand F specs? CHAIN? Error handling? Overrides? DDM files? Is it SQL, RPG or ODBC? There are so many fundamental requirements that need to be met before I can effectively help that it is practically impossible to do so. Who has the time to literally write a textbook, one email at a time? This is a real problem, I think. I feel that most of the people here who take the time to write answers and express opinions are sincere in their desire to be helpful. But it is just easier to answer a question with many details than it is to answer a generic question with few details. At that point, the poster is losing time waiting for answers to trickle in, piece by piece. It would be better if the poster could either ask a question with more details, or find help locally. Either books or in person. This particular question isn't easy to find an answer to in the IBM manuals. But the iSeries programmer rarely cares about main memory capacity. So a better response to the question might have been to ask 'Why does it matter? What business problem are you trying to answer?' Then, we could hear more details about the underlying problem and perhaps have been more helpful. Cheers! --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.