|
> You're comparing a multi-user multi-purpose server > box to a dedicated controller. The iSeries IS NOT > MEANT TO BE A DEDICATED PROCESSOR. I think that we are all in complete agreement on that point. What we are saying is that the IBM mantra of 'server consolidation' flies in the face of economic reality. With an 820, we are told that we can run MANY DIFFERENT workloads on that machine, including a web server (1). We tried that, and found worse performance than with the PC. And the PC has very similar uptime to the 820. The problem is that when the PC network guys say "Hey! We can host that website on our existing PC network and it'll be faster than your mainframe." They are comparing one task (web serving) between their platform and ours. And ours loses for THAT task. When we compare OLTP processing to their PC network, we kill them. Task for task is the comparison, and that's what makes it a valid one, I think. I just think that if IBM is serious about this 'e-server' business they should make their e-business functions kick serious butt, rather than be approximately adequate. --buck (1) http://www-132.ibm.com/content/home/store_IBMPublicUSA/en_US/eServer/iSeries /hardware/earliermodels.html "An affordable, scalable server for businesses adopting e-business, consolidating enterprise servers or both. i820 delivers outstanding performance and price, and can provide dramatic improvements for green-screen applications."
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.