|
From: "Steve Landess" <steve_landess@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Why NOT the 400? Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:29:14 -0500
Good response, James. I agree with most of your statement, except the RPG part...
There's too much legacy code written in RPG that they need to support, according to their long-time philosophy (going back to S/38 days) of "protecting the customer's investment in their application software".
Problem is, they went back on that philosophy several years ago when they
started charging extra for interactive CPW. Since then they either want you
to rewrite everything using WebSphere & Java (and use IBM Global Services to
do the work), or they want you to pay through th a$$ to keep your legacy
apps running.
Steve _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.