RE: Manipulation of system portion of the thread's list.

Jorge:

You sound as if the sequence relative to QSYS is important to you. If you have 
a good reason for this, you can make a Design Change Request of IBM and maybe 
get it changed. And if you can explain your reason for needing this to the rest 
of us on the list, perhaps we can suggest ways around it or perhaps we'll agree 
that it's a good idea and we can all ask IBM to change it.

You are aware that CHGSYSLIBL is only effective while the job runs? It doesn't 
affect any other jobs.

Tom Liotta

midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   7. Re: Manipulation of system portion of the thread's library
>      list. (jmoreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
>
>After much thinking and consideration I have to accept the fact
>that System Libraries below QSYS being removed cannot be
>placed back and retain the original System Library list sequence.
>
>I wish this situation could change in future releases.

-- 
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788 x313
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertechgroup.com


__________________________________________________________________
McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network.
Comprehensive protection for your entire computer. Get your free trial today!
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/computing/mcafee/index.jsp?promo=393397

Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge.  Download Now!
http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455