Re: Differences among network printer setups -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Differences among network printer setups
From: "Buck" <buck.calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:53:53 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Alan Kincer wrote:

> Do you think there will be any problems
> if I change the device type to PRT?

You will probably have fewer problems with a DEVD than you do with RMTOUTQ.

> Also some of the libraries for these printers
> is QGPL whereas most are QUSRSYS. For
> the sake of consistency do you forsee any
> problems with moving the QGPLs over to QUSRSYS?

Depends on your library lists and whether you have duplicate output queue
names or not.
  --buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.