× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Carl,

If I understood your comment correctly, SNADS can be setted up and used
without any changes in the TCP/IP line configuration.
I didn't know that! This is a great reason for a further use of SNADS.
In our case it's more a philosophic question than an actual question of
transfer speed. Our customer refuses the configuration of "old SNA stuff"
and SNADS unfortunately sounds like this.    
Thanks also to all the others for their response. DDM is obviously the
mostly used method.
Regards,
Werner Noll
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Carl Galgano [mailto:cgalgano2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2003 13:55
An: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Betreff: RE: SNA over TCP/IP


Werner:
You do not need to configure anynet to use SNADS over Ethernet.  If your
AS400s are on the same LAN, then you just configure the APPC controller
(type *LAN).  SNA over Ethernet requires you use the MAC address of the
Ethernet card.  That is how the addressing is done.  

If it is over a WAN and you are using CISCO routers, you can use dlsw to
route the SNA over the IP network.  Again, ANYNET is not required.

cjg

Carl J. Galgano
EDI Consulting Services, Inc.
550 Kennesaw Avenue, Suite 800
Marietta, GA  30060
(770) 422-2995 - voice
(419) 730-8212 - fax
mailto:cgalgano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ediconsulting.com
AS400 EDI, Networking, E-Commerce and Communications Consulting and
Implementation 
http://www.icecreamovernight.com
Premium Ice Cream Brands shipped Overnight

"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know" - rw



Hi All,

I'll have a discussion with a customer about the best methods of data
transfer between two iSeries systems. The systems are already connected by
TCP/IP. The issue is to transfer periodically files from one system to the
other. In the past we already used SNADS functions as well as FTP. I
personally prefer SNADS, which would require the Anynet-Support. In previous
postings I read something about a slow down when Anynet is used (in
comparison with pure SNA or pure TCP/IP). Would this be remarkable? Does
Anynet realy slow down also the interactive traffic on a TCP/IP line? Many
thanks for any arguments pros and cons. 
Regards,
GEFIS Gesellschaft für
Individual-Software mbH
Werner Noll


_______________________________________________


_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.