RE: WRKJOBSCDE Filename ??

[qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Tom Liotta)]

Al:

Would you please expand on why you feel it was a 'clooge'? I mean, I believe 
that there are enhancements that should be made (e.g., dependencies), but I've 
liked the general object structure from the beginning. It's been the minimal 
enhancement for _years_ that's been my big issue.

Tom Liotta

midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   9. Re: WRKJOBSCDE Filename ?? (Al Barsa)
>
>It's not a file, it's a clooge.  It was just a bad implementation (IMHO) by
>IBM, and I recently convinced them to avoid a comparable implementation of
>some new feature in a future release.
>
>If you want to convert this to a file, see this tool:
>
>http://www.taatool.com/document/L_cvtjobscde.htm
>
>Al

-- 
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788 x313
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertechgroup.com


__________________________________________________________________
Try AOL and get 1045 hours FREE for 45 days!
http://free.aol.com/tryaolfree/index.adp?375380

Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge.  Download Now!
http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455