RE: WRKJOBSCDE Filename ??

[Al Barsa <barsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

First of all let me say that IBM put the whole kit and caboodle in one
object, which admittedly did reduce save/restore overhead, but made the
individual parts of the data more difficult to manipulate.  So they had to
write API's, etc. Someone explained to me (and I don't remember why) a file
wouldn't have worked at the time, but I think that it was related to the
types of data that we had available then.

In a future release of OS/400 (not that I ever know anything about the
future), IBM was going to do the same thing for a certain new type of data
object, and I persuaded them to make them individual objects.

I'm not a liberty to say more about that, but ask me for an example after
the next release or two comes out.

Al

Al Barsa, Jr.
Barsa Consulting Group, LLC

400>390

914-251-1234
914-251-9406 fax

http://www.barsaconsulting.com
http://www.taatool.com



                                                                           
             qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxx                                             
             net (Tom Liotta)                                              
             Sent by:                                                   To 
             midrange-l-bounce         midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx             
             s@xxxxxxxxxxxx                                             cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
             05/22/2003 04:49          RE: WRKJOBSCDE Filename ??          
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             Midrange Systems                                              
                 Technical                                                 
                Discussion                                                 
             <midrange-l@xxxxx                                             
                 nge.com>                                                  
                                                                           
                                                                           




Al:

Would you please expand on why you feel it was a 'clooge'? I mean, I
believe that there are enhancements that should be made (e.g.,
dependencies), but I've liked the general object structure from the
beginning. It's been the minimal enhancement for _years_ that's been my big
issue.

Tom Liotta

midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   9. Re: WRKJOBSCDE Filename ?? (Al Barsa)
>
>It's not a file, it's a clooge.  It was just a bad implementation (IMHO)
by
>IBM, and I recently convinced them to avoid a comparable implementation of
>some new feature in a future release.
>
>If you want to convert this to a file, see this tool:
>
>http://www.taatool.com/document/L_cvtjobscde.htm
>
>Al

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788 x313
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertechgroup.com


__________________________________________________________________
Try AOL and get 1045 hours FREE for 45 days!
http://free.aol.com/tryaolfree/index.adp?375380

Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge.  Download Now!
http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455
_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.