|
I would agree entirely with Jon. Our New England Conference each year is 2 1/2 days, affordable, and focused. The Tuesday night banquet is especially fun because all of the speakers spread out from table to table. But so far as hurting COMMON's attendance, the effect appears to be just the opposite. There seems to be a pecking order that we see. Shops allow most of their folks to go to our show, and when they are more experienced and deserve a bigger reward, they are allowed to go to COMMON. Getting shops to let their people to go to our show is the easiest and first affordable step for an IT Department. Costs are under $1,000, and travel is no major hurdle. When the employers see the value of these kinds of conferences, they accept the idea of COMMON and its larger commitment. --------------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin http://www.MartinVT.com Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------- -------Original Message------- From: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Date: Friday, May 02, 2003 07:21:53 To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: COMMON rates (was RE: Congrads John Earl!) >> I wonder why these other conferences were really started. To fill a niche that they felt that neither COMMON, nor the tech conference were addressing, to grab some bucks, or to address some personal grudge. Well - since I am one of the organizers of one of those conferences (RPG World running right now in Orlando) I can speak to that. Our conference was started to fill a niche. Whenever we speak at COMMON, Tech conference, User Group conferences etc. we always get asked the same question by programmers - "Why isn't there a conference that just focuses on RPG? I don't need all this Java, WebSphere, (insert flavor of the month here) and there aren't enough RPG sessions". Also some managers won't send their staff to conferences like COMMON because they fear that they will spend time learning Java instead of learning more about RPG. We responded by providing a conference that focuses entirely on RPG. I also feel that a great many people are happier with a smaller conference where they can establish a relationship with the speakers and "follow" the same speaker though a variety of topics. It makes the experience that much closer to having a private training class. Several times in the past few days people have remarked to me how much they enjoy the intimacy of a conference like ours compared with COMMON where they felt overwhelmed. Different people like different things. That applies to the size of a conference just as much as it applies to choice of car vacation spot etc. Why would we expect anything else? If the alternative conferences (with the possible exception of the IBM Tech Conf) did not exist, it would not significantly affect COMMON's numbers. For one thing they are meeting a different need and for another even if _all_ the people that attend them showed up at COMMON (which would never happen no matter what), it wouldn't make much difference to COMMON's numbers in terms of a percentage - they are all too small. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. .
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.