RE: the QSYS38 library,

["Booth Martin" <Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Debbie, this problem might justify buying Hawkeye.  Hawkeye has some nice
features for the problem you've described 
 
 
 
---------------------------------------------------------
Booth Martin   http://www.MartinVT.com
Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Date: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 09:31:29
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE:
 
Joe,
I'm not looking for the pros and cons. Our position is that we don't have
a problem, the
vendor does. They should deal with it. However, 90% of our stuff is
already converted.
Wouldn't take much to convert the rest and would probably take less time
than to keep
haggling with the vendor to fix what is obviously wrong with their stuff.
Our time on this
project is short. I just wanted to know if there would be a problem with
recompiling the
files and not recompiling all of the programs over the files.
Thanks anyway.
 
Debbie Panco
Senior Systems Analyst / Project Leader
United Consumer Financial Services
865 Bassett Road
Westlake, Ohio 44142
dpanco43@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
440-835-6674
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe Pluta
 
>Debbie, I can't help with the pros and cons of removing the QSYS38 library,
>since I don't have one in my environment. But I'm a little confused as to
>why having this library in your library list should have anything to do
with
>the vendor's sofware. It seems unlikely to me that this would be a
problem,
>unless the vendor somehow has program or command names that conflict with
>the old S/38 naming conventions. Is this the case? If so, have you tried
>putting their library ahead of QSYS38 on your library list to see how that
>works?
>Joe