|
Ok, guys, I'm seeing two schools of thought here. Dave & Gord say to let the
WHERE do the
"joining", whereas Rick suggests using JOIN and taking care of file placement
in the join.
Gord also mentions that using WHERE will cause the query optimizer to determine
the best path.
I spruced up Rick's example and came up with:
Select All T01.JOBNUM, T01.REVNUM, T01.PHSCD,
T01.CCPNUM, T01.CCPAMT, T02.CSTTYP
From PCPESTCCP T01
join PCPJOBHDR T03 on
T01.JOBNUM = T03.JOBNUM
join PCPTBLCCP T02 on
T03.CMPNUM = T02.CMPNUM
and T01.CCPTYP = T02.TBLID
and T01.CCPNUM = T02.CCPNUM
Where T01.JOBNUM = '3ACM0170'
and T02.CSTTYP = 'C'
I suppose it gets into personal opinion, but, in this example anyway, I find
using the JOIN makes
it more apparent that you are joining files and how you are joining them. (vs.
using WHERE to do
the join.)
Comments and advice are welcome & appreciated.
- Dan
--- "Smith, Dave" <DSmith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dan:
>
> The join using the WHERE is no different than the join using the JOIN. (A
> rose by any other
> name....) Within my embedded SQL, I like to use the JOIN operator because
> it's consistent with
> the LEFT OUTER JOIN and EXCEPTION JOIN operators. I must say the more SQL I
> learn, the more I
> love it!
>
> David Smith
> dsmith@xxxxxxxxx
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.