|
I tend to use JOINs -- I guess it's just the way I learned it. I think it makes it easier when I am combining JOINs (which are actually INNER JOINs) with OUTER JOINs (as someone else said). Also, I have learned from experience that I can significantly speed up a query by re-arranging the order of the JOINs, following the rule of trying to reduce the size of the result set as quickly as possible as early as possible. (I've also found that using WITH can speed things up, but that's another story. . .). I don't know if the optimizer would find the best combination of joins when just WHEREs are used, but it shouldn't be hard to check: just create a query where the order of the JOINs really matters and then test various orders using JOINs and WHEREs. No time today, but I may try this some day. . . . midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: >I find using the JOIN makes >it more apparent that you are joining files and how you are joining them. > (vs. using WHERE to do >the join.) > >Comments and advice are welcome & appreciated. > >- Dan Mike Naughton Senior Programmer/Analyst Judd Wire, Inc. 124 Turnpike Road Turners Falls, MA 01376 413-863-4357 x444 mnaughton@xxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.