|
Scott, Here are some thoughts triggered by your question. - Quadrupling memory sounds ridiculous! - Sometimes a major upgrade is the right time to add memory. This is more cultural than technical, but sometimes it's easier to get stuff when management already has their wallets out. This may or may not apply to your organization; you will have to judge based upon what you know about your own company and how they make decisions. - As you look at the Enterprise software bundle, you may decide to use some software which is not currently installed. This would probably require additional main storage. - The requirement for external storage sounds bogus to me. I don't have a technical basis for saying that, but if a vendor made those claims to me, I would ask for supporting technical documentation. - The fact that you're not faulting does not necessarily mean that OS/400 could not make productive use of extra memory. Apparently you are below the faulting threshold on your current machine and may well be below it on your new box. - If you're moving up a few releases of OS/400, your memory requirements could increase somewhat (but not hugely) as a result of the upgrade. - I've always believed that you can't have too much in the way of good looks, money, and main storage. Since I don't move much of the first two, I've always gone for more memory. - You don't mention what 620 you're coming from, but even if it is the largest, you are increasing your processing power (CPW) by at least 250%. Depending on your batch workload, you may use this CPW at times. If your company can afford it, I would add an additional two GB. If these are very hard times and management insists on empirical justification, I would stay with your current amount, but ask your company to budget for an additional two GB if performance suffers as a result of the upgrade. You may well be fine without additional memory but I'm not sure that you've given enough information to make a judgment. Regards, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse > On Behalf Of Ingvaldson, Scott > Subject: Main Storage on new models > > All - > > We are in the process of getting quotes on a new 810-2466/7409 to > replace an > aging 620. The 620 has 2 GB of main storage. One BP is telling us > that 2 > GB will be fine in the new 810, another is saying they would recommend > 8 GB > (at a cost of $25,000!) > > They say that the additional memory is needed due to the new model and > the > possibility that we may be moving to ESS (shark) external DASD on the > new > box. > > We don't have any apparent memory constraints on our current box, less > than > 20 faults/second on average. > > Has anyone got any thoughts on this? > > Scott Ingvaldson
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.