×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I have a customer who has been gradually consolidating an application from
two boxes onto one. Both sets of users run the same core application, but
are for all practical purposes separate business and have separate datasets
and supporting programs.
The two business have different cycles and want to run their day end
processes at separate times. Hictorically they have ended the QSERVER
subsystem and the host servers and re-started them when required to prevent
ODBC and the like causing file locking with the application processes and
the end of day saves.
The question is now: how do they manage this for two discrete sets of users ?
Everything I have found so far tells me that it is not possible to have two
separate sets of servers or QSERVER jobs, therefore I have to manage the
access in some other way.
At the moment the probably plan of attack is to terminate the host server
and QSERVER and disable the user profiles. When processing for the first
day end is complete the profiles for that business will be enabled, and the
second set enabled when their day end finishes. The user profiles will
probably be identified using the accounting code, unless someone suggests a
better way :)
Of course this only works because the day ends can commence at the same
time, although I cannot count on this forever. How would I go about
terminating one set of users if I wanted to use the approach above
*without* actually downing the host servers for the unaffected application ?
At this stage the idea of tracking this and managing it via the exit
programs (the only thing I can think of) is looking like a very uneconomic
task (and daunting) task...
I am thinking that some of the security tools might help me here if they
have the ability to turn accessibility off and on like this. Can they do
this ? Do these applications have the ability to identify the users
currently using the various server and perform and action on them like
ending their jobs ?
I know that LPAR would get me around this but it's not an option right now.
I'm not sure whether the independent ASP facility will help me, but I'm
betting it probably won't as my understanding is that it shares these kind
of functions (i.e. the servers) and essentially segregates user data on the
same machine.
Any thoughts or experiences along these lines out there ?
regards
Evan Harris
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.