Re: Output from PF to Excel XLS file in IFS

I don't know about other people, but for me it's something like:

   Macrosloth Ess Queue Ell Server  (although I will admit that I usually
omit the "Macrosloth" bit).

HTH





pnelson@arbsol.com@midrange.com on 02/07/2003 12:05:24 PM

Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
       <midrange-l@midrange.com>

Sent by:    midrange-l-bounces@midrange.com


To:    Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@midrange.com>
cc:
Subject:    Re: Output from PF to Excel XLS file in IFS


   Yes.

   www.asc-iseries.com

   Then to confuse things even more,  how do you pronounce Microsoft SQL
   Server?   :-))

   Dan <dbcemid@yahoo.com>
   Sent by: mi drange-l-bounces@midrange.com
   02/07/2003 08:43 AM  PST
   Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical D iscussion

   To: Midrange  Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@midrange.com>
   <FO NT SIZE=2>cc:
   bcc:
    Subject: Re: Output from PF to Excel XLS file in IFS< /FONT>

   --- pnelson@arbs ol.com wrote:
   >    Mike,
   >
   >    Bite  the bullet and go with SEQUEL. I'm just finishing up 4 =
   weeks at a
   &g t;    client where I've created several dozen routines over the J DE
   sy= stem
   >    that do exactly what you are looking for . The bulk of these run at
   nig= ht
   >    and produce all k inds of reports/spreadsheets that are emailed to
   the va   rious recipi ents.
   > The email addresses are stored in the JDE files for
   > & nbsp;  indiv= iduals, but to make things more efficient, I've used
   t he
   >    distribution list = feature built in to the SEQUE L product.
   Just to be absolu tely clear:  Are you talking about ASC's SEQUEL
   product
   and not IBM's  SQL
   product?  I'm pretty sure it's the former, but I'm now working  in a
   shop
   where people say "sequel"
   instead of "S-Q-L&quo t; when we talk about IBM's SQL product.  Drives
   me
   nuts.
   <B R>- Dan