|
Easy killer, I was just saying that nothing is perfect. I like OS/400 too. jch -----Original Message----- From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 10:19 AM To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: RE: Lower End AS/400s > From: Justin Haase > > Now now... I can think of plenty of times I've had an ODBC > connection run my > dasd up 100+ Gb (Unprotect storage) when it crapped out and went in to a > loop. This is a programmer problem, not an OS problem. This can only happen when you allow unfettered access to your machine. ODBC is a bad answer to many questions, precisely because it does things like this. You could create a client/server interface that would do this without ever having a possibility of a disk use crash. However, nobody does it. Why? Because it takes work. ODBC is "free". Of course, it's only free until it costs you a half a day in downtime. But in any event, it's not the OS, it's a programming problem. Programming problems such as loops because you didn't check for end of file or dumps because you didn't test user input are not OS problems. They are coding problems attributable to the programmer. And any ODBC problem is directly attributable to the person who decided to allow that ODBC access. Don't blame the operating system when you let the lunatics run the asylum. > I've seen a developer take down a box three times in a day because running > debug blew up the machine. Never saw this in over 20 years on the platform. Takes a true expert to crash the machine, bring it back up, do the same thing, crash the machine again, bring it back up, AND THEN DO THE SAME THING AGAIN. At a certain point it moves from OS problem to aggressive stupidity on the part of the developer. > No OS is perfect. If it was, there would be no such thing as PTFs. No operating system comes close to OS/400 for uptime, stability and backwards compatibility. None. Anywhere on the planet. Try running a Windows program you wrote 20 years ago on a current machine. Oh yeah, there was no Windows 20 years ago. Okay, try running one from 10 years ago. Heck, try running one from three years ago and see how well it works. > OS/400 is good. Compared to Windows as an enterprise server OS > it blows its > doors off, but don't get too confident. Comparing Windows to OS/400 is like comparing a go-cart made from scrap lumber and shopping cart wheels to a BMW. Joe _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.