|
This is a multipart message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Excellent response! It is so much easier to get management to approve an upgrade under a lease. And when it does get obsolete you don't choke and die on the initial price. Sometimes we've found upgrades to actually lower our lease. Rob Berendt -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin "Booth Martin" <Booth@MartinVT.com> Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com 12/12/2002 09:09 PM Please respond to midrange-l To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> cc: Fax to: Subject: Re: Lower End AS/400s -- -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] One choice for "save costs immediatly" is the IBM Leasing plans. Get the lowest 3 year term you can get and include software subscription. When the three years is up let it go back and get another one. The costs are known up front, no surprises, and there's no capital outlay. Plus you're always current. --------------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin http://www.MartinVT.com Booth@MartinVT.com --------------------------------------------------------- -------Original Message------- From: midrange-l@midrange.com Date: Thursday, December 12, 2002 05:30:32 PM To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: Re: Lower End AS/400s Syd, We can preach this all day, but today the directive seems to be to cut costs *immediately* and we'll worry about the additional future costs in the future. IBM must realize that and come up w/ a plan to make money, yet keep entry costs low. -mark Original Message: ----------------- From: Dr Syd Nicholson sydnic@ccs400.com Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 00:05:18 +0000 To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: Re: Lower End AS/400s I have experienced this many times. The up front cost of the iSeries seems to be expensive. On the other hand the iSeries does not need an army of technicians to keep it happy, to change its diaper every time it hiccups. In the longer term, the iSeries is a much cheaper option. Windows servers possibly the most expensive. The cost is not just the hardware, or the software, but in the cost of additional support staff, disruption to business when things go wrong, etc, etc. With the increased integration built into OS/400, the iSeries is many servers in one allowing a degree of business and application integration that is second to none. When comparing costs, many people only see the prices of the hardware/software and can't see beyond it. A true review should also include all the other ancillary costs as well (eg. staffing, training, staff turn over, downtime, etc). -- [ IMSTP.gif of type image/gif deleted ] -- _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.