Re: Odd/Even packed numbers. -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Odd/Even packed numbers.
From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 07:04:10 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Giuseppe Costagliola <gcosta@sidin.it>
> actually I have this RIDICULOUS problem:
> I repeated the test with 2 logicals (2 keys - K1+K2 and K2+K1 on the same
> 7/8/9.0 pf); adding only 10,000,000 records gave these results:
> 7.0 needs 403secs of CPU while 8.0 needs 401secs and 9.0 needs 402secs, in
> other words 7,8 or 9 makes no difference.

My test was about adding numbers, not adding records. Adding records will
have no difference for 8 0 and 9 0 because they have the same length
(5 double-nibbles)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.