|
Yes, but you still can end up with additional unnecessary disk accesses when that happens. To clarify my point, I actually did see a new programmer create a file with a record length of 260 once - but the real killer was they had added a 10 byte "filler" field to the end of what was actually only 250 bytes of data. ;-) ...Neil PaulMmn <PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com> To: midrange-l@midrange.com cc: Subject: Re: Odd/Even packed numbers. I haven't worried about file record lengths (or pack maps, for that matter) since we converted from the S/360/20/5 to the S/3/15-- which knew how to span records of strange length across sector boundaries. --Paul E Musselman PaulMmn@ix.netcom.nospam.com >True - but I still cringe when I see some new programmer create a new file >with a record length like 257 ! ;-) > >...Neil
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.