|
Well, yeah - it's called apropos (don't ask why, I don't know)
apropos searches a set of database files containing short descriptions of system commands for keywords and displays the result on the standard output.
I'm as much a 400/iSeries bigot as anyone, I think. And I also think that 400 developers are not the only people with intelligence (not to suggest that anyone is saying that, but this religious discussion gets a little too warm, sometimes - no one wins). UNIX uses a lot of short, albeit cryptic, commands. So did System/36 - maybe not so cryptic, but YMMV. A lot of 400 bigots on this list probably used the 36 and loved its short, little typing, commands. A number of veterans write things like "wa" for WRKACTJOB - it's faster by far, right? Or "s" for "signoff endcnn(*yes)". Unix was also developed by programmers, to a great extent. We tend to do cute things all the time. So "ping" means "packet internet groper" (really), as well as what sonar does underwater. But it's kinda funny, if you're in the mood. There was not a corporate standard that made you use 3-letter short forms of words, with no (or few) vowels most of the time. But I find it funny that IBM insisted (it had to) on VFYTCPCNN for PING - I'm glad they used PING, too. Would ANY of you enter VFYTCPCNN on a 400 command line, given the choice? Another example - GNU means "GNU's not Unix" - a recursive TLA (three-letter-acronym), no less. Someone asked about a number of commands - man, ls, etc. They do make some sense, usually - man means manual, ls is probably list, cat could mean catalog, although the connection with that in its current usage is probably a little weak. awk is the first three letters of the last names of the guys who wrote it (Aho, Kernighan, and Weinberger). Kernighan (and Ritchie, IIRC) wrote the seminal book on C. I don't know, see what you think of these remarks. Just rambling a little. Cheers Vern At 09:47 AM 11/13/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>From: Hans Boldt [mailto:boldt@ca.ibm.com] >Look Joe, I don't mean to criticize OS/400, but its command set can >be just as confusing to a Posix programmer as the Posix command set >can be to an OS/400 programmer. True, does UNIX offer the menu "MAJOR" (or something similar)to find commands with though? An F4 from any command line brings you to this menu. Very handy for newbies and dummies like myself.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.