Re: Paging file

["Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxx>]

I don't think we disagree.

----- Original Message -----
From: <steven.ryan@denso.com.au>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: Paging file


>
> Leif
>
> I'm not looking at quibbling over semantics.  It's just the impression I
> got from your original post was that if security was involved, then
> security was the only consideration.  Convenience, cost/benefit, etc. were
> all secondary.  Perhaps I misunderstood your message, but that's how I read
> it.  That's why I quoted that part of it.
>
> The second half is just a continuation of the same theme.  You say that you
> should only dispense with security when you don't need it.  I feel you
> should dispense with security (or employ it at a lower level) if it is too
> inconvenient (i.e. effects productivity excessively) or if it is too
> costly.  There may be times where it is useful to have security, but too
> expensive or inconvenient to justify it.
>
> Maybe you think that too, maybe not.
>