|
I saw an S/36 contractor escorted out the door of General Mills, because he had objects with different names than source members, spread all over the place, with no external documentation (i.e., it was all in his head). Job security? Not this time. At 07:38 AM 10/3/02 -0400, you wrote:
Thanks Joel - I don't think they intentionally delete the source: they just remove their personal library and everything in it...not realizing they have production objects operating from their personalized source files. Where I do get bent is them not copying the tested object into the live source file for re-compilation into production. SO MANY people, who have been around for SO MANY years, totally blind to the importance of change management...this particular problem is just a very good example of that.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.