|
This is a multipart message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I do not think that people do not upgrade because the new releases are not better. I think they fail to upgrade for a number of reasons 1) Unwillingness to work after hours to apply the upgrade. 2) Illiteracy. Failure to have read the terms of software subscription when there were sweet deals on it. 3) Why fix something when it is broke the way I know it is? 4) Trying to get the platform to fail and get old so that they can get their other favorite platform in there. 5) IBM doesn't have the 1 or two feature that they want in the new release so let's cut off our noses to spite our face. 6) Lookie what I can do with stone knives and bearskins! 7) Dang, I am getting old. Do I want to put something on here that them young whippersnappers can show me up on? 8) I don't want to give my customers any ammunition to go to their management and say we need to upgrade if we want to continue using the software from vendor xyz. Rob Berendt -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin Konrad Underkofler <kdunderk@hoshizaki.com> Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com 09/09/2002 12:35 PM Please respond to midrange-l To: "'midrange-l@midrange.com'" <midrange-l@midrange.com> cc: Fax to: Subject: RE: OS400 release levels Rob, Of course I have to jump in, "better" is a relative word. If new releases were so wonderful people would upgrade like crazy. I believe the operative word for an OS/400 release might be "different" not quantifiably "better". Most of the original testing of ILE concluded that performance was approximately the same, so the big question is why upgrade? why use it? Programming is getting more complicated not less and that alone discourages usage of the new features. If you only have one production machine with no inhouse resource to apply the release why take the risk? I do believe if you do use the Java stuff or have new peripherals it does make sense to upgrade since it is either mandatory or necessary from a performance / compatibility point of view. But then if you do use Java you might also be considering other platforms where Java is nore native or evolved as well. :)) Konrad _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.