RE: V5R1 question

[Dennis Munro <DMunro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rob,

The following are the severity 40 errors I found in the job log:

TCP5713  -  When trying to end the DHCP server that was not running

CPFB923   -    An attempt was made to end the Management Central Server job,
QYPSSRV.  However, the job could not be ended.  The reason code is 01.
                  Reason Codes: 01 - The Management Central Server job is
not running.      (And that is okay now)
CP1A0A  -    STRTCPSVR processing ended abnormally, reason code is 0005.
0005 - STRTCPSVR processing DOMINO server failed.  Server product must be
loaded to continue process.   (Domino is not installed)

TCP8638  -     The VPN server will not start if a cryptographic access
provider product and the Digital Certificate Manager are not installed.
(And they are not)

CPF9006  -     User not enrolled in system distribution directory.     (BPCS
user profile was not & I added the profile)
CPFA0D4  -   File system experienced an unexpected error. Error Number  3498
was received.               Do a DSPMSGD CPE3498 to display an error message
containing more information about this error number.
         (DSPMSGD CPE3498 = You attempted to use a function that requires
you to be enrolled in the system distribution directory and you are not.

        With this last error, I never could really determine what it was
trying to point/refer to.
 Thanks - Dennis.

Dennis Munro

"I love deadlines.  I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they
go flying by."  Dilbert's Words Of Wisdom:

Badger Mining Corporation
www.badgerminingcorp.com
dmunro@badgerminingcorp.com
(920) 361-2388

-----Original Message-----
From: rob@dekko.com [mailto:rob@dekko.com]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:42 PM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: V5R1 question

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Dennis,

I had backed off on putting people in the SDD because of my mistaken
belief that it was an old carry over from SNADS, OV/400 and other products
obsoleted in this day and age of TCP/IP.  Apparently some functions of
TCP/IP use this also.

Was it a particular TCP/IP service that was giving you the error?

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin