|
Hi Mike Do you have any similar measurements for restore activities ? I have heard these drives are significantly slower (which would really bite in a disaster situation) so if you have some some real world experience to share I would very much appreciate if you would share it. I am particularly intrigued by the notion of how it performs for the IFS which is already a slow beast to deal with for save and restore operations. Anyone else with similar experiences is welcome to enlighten me. >Chuck, > >Take a look at IBM's 3581 H17. We have one attached to a Model 830 4-Way >and it really rips. I am backing up 248 GB in a full system backup in 2 >Hours, 30 Minutes. It's a one cartridge backup! > >I as you had 3590's in a previous life and I am finding the performance of >the 3581 to very close to the 3590 in terms of speed. You can buy multiple >3581's for the cost of one 3590. > >The only thing I do not like about 3581 is the cartridges. They are pretty >flimsy compared to 3590. I make sure all my media going offsite are in >individual plastic containers inside the lock box. > ><HTH> > >Regards, > >Mike Shaw
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.