|
Rob, If IBM's response to users concerns about the frequency and reliability of OS/400 upgrades is to "publish something" then they deserve the declining business they have. Their current release policy is just a dumb attempt to generate revenue forcing people forward with little value add. Unfortunately those of us that use the 400's for 24/7 operations do not have 2 boxes, one of which would be used to beta test every poorly documented buggy new release of the OS. Any action being taken with IBM over the unreliable 840? An expensive machine down that long would have major repercussions at most companies (ie who picked it? can we get a refund? we need to find something more reliable?) Regards Konrad
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.