|
Now I am even more confused... He would buy and set up this little $500 box just so he can flip the A/B switch and run Windows to use IE to visit the sites of the web writers that love the Microsoft-exclusive features?????? Then, after being properly awed, he'd flip the A/B switch back to his real life and business? Is this any basis for a business model? I'm prepared to admit that Microsoft has won the Desktop Operating System Wars, but for all the rest of applications out there Microsoft in any category, whether its spreadsheets or getting the correct time. Add to this that the desktop is rapidly becoming replaced by all sorts of specialized appliances and one has to seriously question the professional judgement of any IT manager that accepts the Microsoft-everywhere mantra. My impression is that Microsoft Kool Aid is just like all the other kool aids... lots of sugar, leading to lots of cavities. --------------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin http://www.MartinVT.com Booth@MartinVT.com --------------------------------------------------------- -------Original Message------- From: midrange-l@midrange.com Date: Sunday, May 12, 2002 12:44:01 To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: When is a Windows network not a Windows network > From: Syd Nicholson > > To go back to a network of Windows machines just to run IE on them will > cost me the $8000 dollars/annum mentioned above. IE is not free- it is > very expensive!!! You've said this several times, Syd, and I guess I'm just confused. Since when does it require a "Windows network" to run IE? My network consists of OS/400, Linux, NT, Win2K and WinME. Each piece does what it was meant to do (except for WinME, which basically does whatever it feels like). It would cost you less than $500 to set up a small Windows client. They have book-sized computer cases now that are perfect for running small, dedicated machines. For about $50 you can get an A/B switch for your keyboard and monitor, and the total footprint is perhaps 12 square inches. Ideal solution? No, but as you point out, there is no ideal solution. But this way, you have a complete Windows-capable machine without any worries about your mission critical systems. There is no sound reason not to have a Windows machine on your network. One workstation doesn't somehow transmogrify your network into a bunch of Windows NT "servers". It's just a peer, like any other, except that now your browser issues go away. Joe _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.