|
Steven, I can see a few valid reasons, what does your boss wish to accomplish? Here are some reasons: - You have a group of workstations which require consistently better response times than others. I have done this at a firm which had a very tight payroll entry window. By configuring the subsystems, these jobs could have a higher priority, longer timeslice, etc. Please note that this could also be accomplished within the same subsystem by different means. - You want the memory hogs to feed together and leave everyone else alone. By separating out memory-intense interactive jobs into a separate pool, other jobs can achieve more consistent response time. - You have a period of time in which you wish to allow some users access to the system while everyone else cannot get a signon screen. You would do this by shutting down one of the interactive subsystems. Note that every objective but the last can be accomplished within a single subsystem. It may make more sense and be more self-documenting to use multiple subsystems for the first two, but it is not a requirement. Regards, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse > Currently all our interactive jobs are in subsystem QINTER. The boss > wants to seperate some jobs in to a seperate interactive subsystem. Is > this wise? > > Steven Donnellan
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.