|
From: James Rich <james@eaerich.com> > True, though I wonder how far IBM can really lower the price > less that an iSeries system. So based only on hardware, IBM can't produce > an iSeries that will be competitive with an Intel based system. This is > simply because there isn't as high a volume of PowerPC fabs as there are > x86 fabs. > PowerPCs are used in Macs, and Mac don't cost $10,000. Now, I agree that it will be hard to produce a $399 iSeries, but we don't have to go that low to be competive. > When considering software, it is hard to beat a $5-$90 CD with your > favorite linux distribution on it. It is even harder to beat a free > download. IBM needs to charge significant dollars for the OS to make back > on their investment - otherwise they will just dump it as any investor > would. IBM can only lower the price so far - Miscrosoft ain't giving away > their OS for free and IBM isn't about to, either. becasue OS/400 is old, it is long paid for. Now, IBM invests new money into making the OS/400 look like Linux. Gee, if you want Linux, go buy an Intel box.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.